International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  10 (2023)
Volume  9 (2020)
Volume  8 (2019)
Volume  7 (2018)
Volume  6 (2017)
Volume  5 (2016)
Volume  4 (2015)
Volume  3 (2014)
Volume  2 (2013)
Volume  1 (2012)
Related articles

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Long-term Results of Mini Asymmetric Radial Keratotomy for the Treatment of Keratoconus

Marco Abbondanza, Gabriele Abbondanza, Valentina De Felice

Keywords : Keratoconus, MARK, Mini asymmetric radial keratotomy

Citation Information : Abbondanza M, Abbondanza G, De Felice V. Long-term Results of Mini Asymmetric Radial Keratotomy for the Treatment of Keratoconus. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2018; 7 (2):105-109.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1165

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To present long-term results of mini asymmetric radial keratotomy (MARK) for the treatment of mild to moderate keratoconus, with an average follow-up of 7.3 years and a minimum of 6 years. Design: Retrospective clinical study. Materials and methods: The postoperative outcomes of 66 eyes (45 patients) were selected and retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were progressive stages I and II keratoconus (Kc) and contact lens intolerance, while exclusion criteria were advanced stages of the pathology and chronic or recurrent ocular infections. Tomography- and topography-guided miniincisions were customised and performed sectorally with a calibrated diamond knife and custom-made corneal markers. Results: After a minimum follow-up of 6 years, mean keratometry improved in 91% of cases (from 47.25 D to 44.61 D), and mean pachymetry improved in 98% of cases (from 446 μm to 484 μm), while best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved for 95% of patients, from 0.23 LogMAR (5.9/10) to 0.095 LogMAR (7.7/10). Conclusion: MARK improved both mean keratometry and mean pachymetry, thus halting the progression of keratoconus, while improving visual acuity. The long-term results suggest that MARK should be considered as one of the conservative treatments for moderate to mild progressive keratoconus.

PDF Share
  1. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;(42)4:297- 319.
  2. Abdelaziz L, Barbara R. History of the development of the treatment of keratoconus. Int J Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Dis 2013;2(1):31-33.
  3. Oh BL, Kim MK, Wee WR. Comparison of clinical outcomes of same-size grafting between deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Korean J Ophthalmol 2013;27(5):322-30.
  4. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-ainduced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135(5):620-627.
  5. Colin J, Cochener B, Savary G, et al. Correcting keratoconus with intracorneal rings. J of Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26(8):1117-1122.
  6. Krumeich JH, Hirnschall N. Effect of Circular Keratotomy on Progression of Keratoconus. Int J Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Dis 2016;5(2):57-62.
  7. Abbondanza M. Mini Cheratotomia Radiale Asimmetrica (Mini ARK) per la correzione chirurgica del cheratocono in fase iniziale, nell'ipermetropia e nelle miopie lievi. Esperienze 1997;12(1):21-24.
  8. Utine CA, Bayraktar S, Kaya V. Radial keratotomy for the optical rehabilitation of mild to moderate keratoconus: more than five years’ experience. Eur J Ophthalmol 2006;16(3):376-384.
  9. Fujimoto K, Osawa H, Moriyama T. Long-Term Stability of Minimally Invasive Radial Keratotomy for Mild to Moderate Keratoconus. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol 2017;6(5):407-411.
  10. Alió JL, Claramonte PJ, Cáliz A. Corneal modeling of keratoconus by conductive keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(1):190-197.
  11. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Keratoconus management: long-term stability of topography-guided normalization combined with high-fluence cxl stabilization (the Athens protocol). J Refract Surg 2014;30(2):88-93.
  12. Kanellopoulos AJ, Pamel JP. Review of current indications for combined very high fluence collagen cross-linking and laser in situ keratomileusis surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61(8):430-432.
  13. El-Raggal TM. Sequential versus concurrent kerarings insertion and corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95(1):37-41.
  14. Abbondanza M, Abbondanza G, De Felice V, et al. Longterm Results of Mini Asymmetric Radial Keratotomy and Corneal Cross-linking for the Treatment of Keratoconus. Kor J Ophthalmol 2019;33(2).
  15. Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Naoumidi TL. Conductive keratoplasty followed by collagen cross-linking with riboflavin-uv-a in patients with keratoconus. Cornea 2010;29(2):239-243.
  16. Fadlallah A, Dirani A, El Rami H. Safety and visual outcome of vision toric icl implantation after corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2013;29(2): 84-89.
  17. Abbondanza M, Abdolrahimzadeh B, Zuppardo M. Refractive Changes Following CXL. Cataract Refract Surg Today Eur 2009;4(7):33-38.
  18. Lombardi M, Abbondanza M. Asymmetric radial keratotomy for the correction of keratoconus. J Refract Surg 1997;13(3):302-307.
  19. Lindstrom RL. Minimally invasive radial keratotomy: Mini- RK. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995;21(1):27-34.
  20. Wilson SL, El Haj AJ, Yang Y. Control of Scar Tissue Formation in the Cornea: Strategies in Clinical and Corneal Tissue Engineering. J Funct Biomater 2012;3(3):642-687.
  21. Lovisolo CF, Mularoni A, Calossi A, et al. Complications of refractive keratotomy. In: Alió JL, Azar DT, editors. Management of Complications in Refractive Surgery. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 197-224.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.