International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Snake-like Chromatin Cell Protein as an Indicator of Chronic Eye Rubbing in Patients with Keratoconus and Allergic Conjunctivitis

Maria A Henriquez, Nadia Canorio, Carmen Maldonado, Mirel Rincon, Luis Izquierdo Jr

Keywords : Eye, Habit, Keratoconus, Rubbing,Conjunctivitis

Citation Information : Henriquez MA, Canorio N, Maldonado C, Rincon M, Izquierdo Jr L. Snake-like Chromatin Cell Protein as an Indicator of Chronic Eye Rubbing in Patients with Keratoconus and Allergic Conjunctivitis. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2018; 7 (2):91-95.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1163

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the presence of snake-like chromatin (SLC) cell protein (related to eye rubbing) in patients with keratoconus or allergic conjunctivitis and in controls. Materials and methods: Prospective experimental study included 193 eyes of 193 patients between January 2015 and July 2016; 86 had a diagnosis of new keratoconus, 88 were controls, and 19 had a diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis and underwent impression cytology (IC). Specimens were stained with a combination of periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and Gill\'s modified papanicolaou stains to detect the presence of SLC cell protein and morphological characterization of dry eye and allergic conjunctivitis. A questionnaire regarding eye-rubbing habits was administered. Results: Of the patients, 56.97% (49/86 eyes) in the keratoconus group, 84.21% (16/19 eyes) in the allergy group, and 10.11% (9/89 eyes) in the control group reported rubbing their eyes. The SLC was detected in 24.41% (21/86), 73.68% (14/19), and 3.37% (3/89) of the keratoconus, allergy, and control groups respectively, who reported rubbing their eyes. In contrast, SLC was detected in 2.32% (2/86), 0% (0/19), and 1.12% (1/89) of the keratoconus, allergy, and control groups respectively, who reported not rubbing their eyes. Conclusion: The presence of SLC cells was higher in keratoconus, allergy, and control group patients who reported rubbing their eyes. Keratoconus is independent of eye-rubbing habits and the presence of SLC cells.


PDF Share
  1. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42(4):297- 319.
  2. Wong KH, Kam KW, Chen LJ, et al. Corneal blindness and current major treatment concern—graft scarcity. Int J Ophthalmol 2017;10(7):1154-1162.
  3. Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Shneor E. The epidemiology and etiology of keratoconus. Int J Keratoco Ectatic Corneal Dis 2012;1(1):7-15.
  4. Gomes JA, Rapuano CJ, Belin MW, et al; Group of Panelists for the Global Delphi Panel of Keratoconus and Ectatic Diseases. Global consensus on keratoconus diagnosis. Cornea 2015;34(12): e38-e39.
  5. Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Kaiserman I, et al. Risk factors for keratoconus in Israel: a case-control study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015;35(6):673-681.
  6. Naderan M, Shoar S, Rezagholizadeh F, et al. Characteristics and associations of keratoconus patients. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015;38(3):199-205.
  7. Kok YO, Tan GF, Loon SC. Review: keratoconus in Asia. Cornea 2012;31(5):581-593.
  8. Gatinel D. Eye rubbing, a sine qua non for keratoconus? Int J Kerat Ect Dis 2016;5(1):6-12.
  9. Mashor RS, Kumar NL, Ritenour RJ, et al. Keratoconus caused by eye rubbing in patients with Tourette syndrome. Can J Ophthalmol 2011;46(1):83-86.
  10. Balasubramanian SA, Pye DC, Willcox MD. Are proteinases the reason for keratoconus? Curr Eye Res 2010;35(3):185-191.
  11. Koenig SB. Bilateral recurrent self-induced keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34(6):343-344.
  12. Yeniad B, Alparslan N, Akarcay K. Eye rubbing as an apparent cause of recurrent keratoconus. Cornea 2009;28(4): 477-479.
  13. Diniz CM, Tzelikis PF, Rodrigues Júnior A, et al. Unilateral keratoconus associated with continual eye rubbing due to nasolacrimal obstruction—case report. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2005;68(1):122-125.
  14. Ioannidis AS, Speedwell L, Nischal KK. Unilateral keratoconus in a child with chronic and persistent eye rubbing. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139(2):356-357.
  15. Jafri B, Lichter H, Stulting RD. Asymmetric keratoconus attributed to eye rubbing. Cornea 2004;23(6):560-564.
  16. Jirsova K, Juklova K, Vesela V, et al. Morphological and immunocytochemical characterization of snake-like chromatin cells. Histol Histopathol 2006;21(4):355-360.
  17. Knop E, Reale E. Fine structure and significance of snakelike chromatin in conjunctival epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35(2):711-719.
  18. Ambrósio R Jr, Caiado AL, Guerra FP, et al. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2011;27(10):753-758.
  19. Takamura E, Uchio E, Ebihara N, et al. Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases 2017. Allergol Int 2017;66(2): 220-229.
  20. Leonardi A, Bogacka E, Fauquert JL, et al. Ocular allergy: recognizing and diagnosing hypersensitivity disorders of the ocular surface. Allergy 2012;67(11):1327-1337.
  21. Gadkari SS, Adrianwala SD, Prayag AS, et al. Conjunctival impression cytology—a study of normal conjunctiva. J Postgrad Med 1992;38(1):21-23, 22A-22B.
  22. Karolak JA, Gambin T, Pitarque JA, et al. Variants in SKP1, PROB1, and IL17B genes at keratoconus 5q31.1-q35.3 susceptibility locus identified by whole-exome sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet 2016;25(1):73-78.
  23. Burdon KP, Vincent AL. Insights into keratoconus from a genetic perspective. Clin Exp Optom 2013;96(2):146-154.
  24. Lauwen S, de Jong EK, Lefeber DJ, et al. Omics biomarkers in ophthalmology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58(6): BIO88- BIO98.
  25. Bawazeer AM, Hodge WG, Lorimer B. Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84(8):834-836.
  26. Sharma N, Rao K, Maharana PK, et al. Ocular allergy and keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61(8):407-409.
  27. Caputo R, Versaci F, Pucci N, et al. Very low prevalence of keratoconus in a large series of vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;172:64-71.
  28. Millodot M, Shneor E, Albou S, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of keratoconus in Jerusalem: a cross-sectional study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2011;18(2):91-97.
  29. McMonnies CW, Alharbi A, Boneham GC. Epithelial responses to rubbing-related mechanical forces. Cornea 2010;29(11):1223-1231.
  30. Chervenkoff JV, Hawkes E, Ortiz G, et al. A randomized, fellow eye, comparison of keratometry, aberrometry, tear film, axial length and the anterior chamber depth after eye rubbing in non-keratoconic eyes. Eye Vis (Lond) 2017;4:19.
  31. Marner K. ‘Snake-like’ appearance of nuclear chromatin in conjunctival epithelial cells from patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1980;58(5): 849-853.
  32. Pienaar JG, Price HM. Ultrastructure and origin of the Anitschkow cell. Am J Pathol 1967;51(6):1063-1091.
  33. McMonnies CW. Mechanisms of rubbing-related corneal trauma in keratoconus. Cornea 2009;28(6):607-615.
  34. Galvis V, Sherwin T, Tello A, et al. Keratoconus: an inflammatory disorder? Eye (Lond) 2015;29(7):843-859.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.