International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Errors Associated to Keratoconus Grading using Systems based on Corneal Power

Vicente Camps

Citation Information : Camps V. Errors Associated to Keratoconus Grading using Systems based on Corneal Power. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2015; 4 (2):41-46.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1096

Published Online: 00-08-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Purpose

To analyze and define the possible errors that may be introduced in keratoconus classification when the keratometric corneal power is used in such classification.

Materials and methods

Retrospective study including a total of 44 keratoconus eyes. A comprehensive ophthalmologic examination was performed in all cases, which included a corneal analysis with the Pentacam system (Oculus). Classical keratometric corneal power (Pk), Gaussian corneal power (PcGauss), True Net Power (TNP) (Gaussian power neglecting the corneal thickness effect), and an adjusted keratometric corneal power (Pkadj) (keratometric power considering a variable keratometric index) were calculated. All cases included in the study were classified according to five different classification systems: Alió-Shabayek, Amsler-Krumeich, Rabinowitz- McDonnell, collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK), and McMahon.

Results

When Pk and Pkadj were compared, differences in the type of grading of keratoconus cases was found in 13.6% of eyes when the Alió-Shabayek or the Amsler-Krumeich systems were used. Likewise, grading differences were observed in 22.7% of eyes with the Rabinowitz-McDonnell and McMahon classification systems and in 31.8% of eyes with the CLEK classification system. All reclassified cases using Pkadj were done in a less severe stage, indicating that the use of Pk may lead to the classification of a cornea as keratoconus, being normal. In general, the results obtained using Pkadj, PcGauss or the TNP were equivalent. Differences between Pkadj and PcGauss were within ± 0.7D.

Conclusion

The use of classical keratometric corneal power may lead to incorrect grading of the severity of keratoconus, with a trend to a more severe grading.

How to cite this article

Llorens DPP, Camps V, Caravaca-Arens E. Errors Associated to Keratoconus Grading using Systems based on Corneal Power. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2015;4(2):41-46.


PDF Share
  1. Estimation of the central corneal power in keratoconus: theoretical and clinical assessment of the error of the keratometric approach. Cornea 2014;33(3):274-279.
  2. New approach for correction of error associated with keratometric estimation of corneal power in keratoconus. Cornea 2014;33(9):960-967.
  3. Characterization of corneal structure in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38(12):2167-2183.
  4. Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35(6):2749-2757.
  5. Pentacam posterior and anterior corneal aberrations in normal and keratoconic eyes. Clin Exp Òptom 2009;92(3):297-303.
  6. Corneal higher order aberrations: a method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2006;22:539-545.
  7. Computer-assisted corneal topography in keratoconus. Refract Corneal Surg 1989;5(6): 400-408.
  8. Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus. J Refract Surg 1995;11(5):371-379.
  9. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998 Jan-Feb; 42(4):297-319.
  10. Automated decision tree classification of corneal shape. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82(12):1038-1046.
  11. KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999 Oct;25(10):1327-1335.
  12. Collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus study: methods and findings to date. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30(4):223-232.
  13. CLEK study group: a new method for grading the severity of keratoconus—the keratoconus severity score. Cornea 2006 Aug;25(7):794-800.
  14. New clinical pathways for keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 2013 Mar;27(3):329-339.
  15. Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010 May;36(5):814-825.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.