International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation in Patients with Mild Keratoconus

Pablo F Rodrigues, Wagner G Dias

Citation Information : Rodrigues PF, Dias WG. Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation in Patients with Mild Keratoconus. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2014; 3 (3):122-126.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1091

Published Online: 01-06-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; The Author(s).


Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the topographic, topometric and visual changes after implantation of Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in grades I and II keratoconus patients.

Materials and methods

The chart records of 50 consecutively operated keratoconus patients were reviewed. The patients were operated on by the same surgeon, with the manual technique. All patients were preoperatively and postoperatively evaluated with the Pentacam (OCULUS Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany). The studied parameters were: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), keratometry, corneal asphericity and corneal volume.

Results

Fifty eyes of 42 patients (26 males and 16 females) were analyzed. The mean preoperative UDVA was 0.91 ranging from LogMAR 0.10 to 1.30. The mean postoperative CDVA was 0.19 ranging from 0.00 to 0.54 LogMAR. The postoperative CDVA was equal or better than 0.18 in 37 cases (74%). The mean K1 decreased from 45.80D (±2.52) preoperatively to 44.27D (± 2.10) postoperatively and the mean K2 value, from 49.06D (± 2.09) to 46.22D (±1.89). The mean asphericity increased from −0.71 preoperatively to −0.29 postoperatively. The average preoperative corneal volume was 56.89 ± 3.11 mm3 while the average postoperative corneal volume was 57.64 ± 3.05 mm3.

Conclusion

The study supports the early indication of implantation of Ferrara ICRS in mild to moderate keratoconus cases in order to achieve good visual, keratometric and ashpericity outcomes.

How to cite this article

Rodrigues PF, Ferrara G, Ferrara P, Dias WG, Torquetti L. Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation in Patients with Mild Keratoconus. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2014;3(3):122-126.


PDF Share
  1. Videokeratography of the fellow eye in unilateral keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1993; 100(2):181-186.
  2. Modification of refraction by means of intra- corneal inclusions. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1966;6(1):53-78.
  3. Unilateral keratoconus. Incidence and quantitative topographic analysis. Ophthalmology 1997;104(9): 1409-1413.
  4. Clinical detection of uni- lateral keratoconus. Australian and New Zealand J Ophthalmol 1995;23(2):129-133.
  5. Eczema and keratoconus. Br Med J 1965; 2(5468):977-979.
  6. Intrastromal corneal ring: 12-month sighted myopic eyes. J Refrac Surg 1996;12(1):20-28.
  7. Keratoconus managed with intacs: one-year results. Archives of Ophthalmology 2005;123(10): 1308-1314.
  8. Intrastromal corneal ring segment SK for moderate to severe keratoconus: a case series. J Refrac Surg 2012;28(10):701-705.
  9. Long-term follow-up of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus. J Cataract Refrac Surg 2009;35(10):1768-1773.
  10. Corneal asphericity in a young adult population. Clinical implications. Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia 2004;79(8): 385-392.
  11. Corneal- thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refrac Surg 2006;32(11):1851-1859.
  12. Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refrac Surg 2010;36(5): 814-825.
  13. Evaluation of anterior segment parameters in keratoconic eyes measured with the Pentacam system. J Cataract Refrac Surg 2007;33(10):1708-1712.
  14. Vision related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. J Ophthalmol 2014;2014:694542.
  15. Collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus study G: changes in the quality-of-life of people with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145(4):611-617.
  16. Evaluation of the impact of intracorneal ring segments implantation on the quality of life of patients with keratoconus using the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of life (NEI-RQL) instrument. Br J Ophthalmol. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94(1):101-105.
  17. Impact of keratoconus in the better eye and the worse eye on vision-related quality of life. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2014;55(1):412-416.
  18. Intrastromal corneal ring segments: visual outcomes from a large case series. Clin Experimental Ophthalmol 2012;40(5):433-439.
  19. Corneal asphericity and apical curvature in children: a cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation. Investigative Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2005;46(6):1899-1906.
  20. Corneal asphericity changes after implantation of intrastromal ring segments in keratoconus. J Emmtropia 2010;1(4):178-181.
  21. Alterations of extracellular matrix components and proteinases in human corneal buttons with INTACS for post-laser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia and keratoconus. Cornea 2008;27(5):565-573.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.