International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Corneal Pachymetry measured with Pentacam and CorvisST in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes

Jose M González-Méijome, Daniela Lopes-Ferreira, Laura Rico-del-Viejo, Patrícia Neves, Helena Ferreira, José Salgado-Borges

Citation Information : González-Méijome JM, Lopes-Ferreira D, Rico-del-Viejo L, Neves P, Ferreira H, Salgado-Borges J. Corneal Pachymetry measured with Pentacam and CorvisST in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2013; 2 (3):104-107.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1061

Published Online: 01-08-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).


Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the agreement of pachymetry data provided by a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) and the corneal biomechanical response with the values provided by Pentacam in healthy and keratoconic eyes.

Methods

Fifty-four right eyes from 54 healthy patients (32 females, 22 males) and 82 eyes from 43 keratoconus patients (20 females, 23 males) were included in the study. All patients were evaluated with Pentacam and CorvisST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) in random order in the same session. CorvisCCT was compared to Pentacam pachymetry in at the corneal center (PentacamCCT) and at the thinnest point (PentacamMinCT).

Results

Average pachymetry provided by CorvisST was 534 ± 34 microns in the healthy population and 476 ± 56 microns in the population with keratoconus. Pachymetric values obtained with Pentacam were highly correlated between them as well as with the Corvis value in both groups, but the correlation coefficients were higher in the healthy group.

Conclusion

Corvis pachymetry can be used interchangeably with Pentacam thinnest point pachymetry in healthy corneas. However, in keratoconic corneas, the difference between both parameters will be higher as the disease progresses and increases the difference between Pentacam pachymetry at cornea center and at the thinnest point.

How to cite this article

González-Méijome JM, Lopes-Ferreira D, Rico-del-Viejo L, Neves P, Ferreira H, Salgado-Borges J. Corneal Pachymetry measured with Pentacam and CorvisST in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2013;2(3):104-107.


PDF Share
  1. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and metaanalysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:367-408.
  2. Corneal thickness changes after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:691-700.
  3. Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1177-1182.
  4. Central corneal thickness measurements in unoperated eyes and eyes after PRK for myopia using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry. J Refract Surg 2007;23:888-894.
  5. Effects of central corneal thickness on measurement of intraocular pressure in keratoconus and postkeratoplasty. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999;19:236-241.
  6. Technical note: accuracy and repeatability of a new portable ultrasound pachymeter. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007;27:190-193.
  7. Topographic paracentral corneal thickness with pentacam and orbscan: effect of acoustic factor. Eye Contact Lens 2011;37:348-353.
  8. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured with Orbscan and Pentacam. J Refract Surg 2007;23:895-899.
  9. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan II and topographical ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:125-132.
  10. Central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurement by Sirius((R)) Scheimpflug tomography and ultrasound. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:417-422.
  11. Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using Visante OCT, Orbscan and Pentacam. J Refract Surg 2010;26:127-133.
  12. Pentacam pachometry: comparison with noncontact specular microscopy on the central cornea and intersession repeatability on the peripheral cornea. Clin Exp Optom 2007;90:108-114.
  13. Central corneal thickness measured with three optical devices and ultrasound pachometry. Eye Contact Lens 2011;37:66-70.
  14. Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry. Optom Vis Sci 2013;90:e1-e8.
  15. A comprehensive evaluation of the precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) of the Oculus Pentacam HR. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:7731-7737.
  16. The thinnest, steepest and maximum elevation corneal locations in noncontact and contact lens wearers in keratoconus. Cornea 2013;32:332-337.
  17. Repeatability of ocular biomechanical data measurements with a scheimpflugbased noncontact device on normal corneas. J Refract Surg 2013;29:558-563.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.