International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of Visual Acuity, Pachymetry and Anterior-Surface Irregularity in Keratoconus and Crosslinking Intervention Follow-up in 737 Cases

Anastasios John Kanellopoulos, Vasiliki Moustou, George Asimellis

Citation Information : Kanellopoulos AJ, Moustou V, Asimellis G. Evaluation of Visual Acuity, Pachymetry and Anterior-Surface Irregularity in Keratoconus and Crosslinking Intervention Follow-up in 737 Cases. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2013; 2 (3):95-103.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1060

Published Online: 00-12-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Purpose

To investigate visual acuity, corneal pachymetry, and anterior-surface irregularity indices correlation with keratoconus severity in a very large pool of clinically-diagnosed untreated keratoconic eyes, and in keratoconic eyes subjected to crosslinking intervention.

Materials and methods

Total of 737 keratoconic (KCN) cases were evaluated. Group A was formed from 362 untreated keratoconic eyes, and group B from 375 keratoconic eyes subjected to partial normalization via topography-guided excimer laser ablation and high-fluence collagen crosslinking. A control group C of 145 healthy eyes was employed for comparison. We investigated distance visual acuity, uncorrected (UDVA), best-spectacle corrected (CDVA), and Scheimpflug-derived keratometry, pachymetry (central corneal thickness, CCT and thinnest, TCT), and two anterior-surface irregularity indices, the index of surface variance (ISV) and the index of height decentration (IHD). The correlations between these parameters vs topographic keratoconus classification (TKC) were investigated.

Results

Keratometry for group A was K1 (flat) 46.67 ± 3.80 D and K2 (steep) 50.76 ± 5.02 D; for group B K1 44.03 ± 3.64 D and K2 46.87 ± 4.61 D; for group C, K1 42.89 ± 1.45 D and K2 44.18 ± 1.88 D. Visual acuity for group A was UDVA 0.12 ± 0.18 and CDVA 0.59 ± 0.25 (decimal), for group B, 0.51 ± 0.28 and 0.77 ± 0.22, and for group C, 0.81 ± 0.31 and 0.87 ± 0.12.

Correlation between ISV and TKC (r2) was for group A 0.853, and for group-B 0.886. Correlation between IHD and TKC was for group A r2 = 0.731, and for group B 0.701. The ROC analysis ‘area under the curve’ was for CDVA 0.550, TCT 0.596, ISV 0.876 and IHD 0.887.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that the traditionally employed metrics of visual acuity and corneal thickness may not be robust indicators nor provide accurate assessment on either keratoconus severity or postoperative evaluation. Two anterior surface irregularity indices, derived by Scheimpflug-imaging, ISV and IHD, may be more sensitive and specific tools.

Précis

Visual acuity, Scheimpflug-derived pachymetry and anterior-surface irregularity correlation to keratoconus severity in untreated cases (A), treated with crosslinking (B), and in a control group (C) reveals that visual acuity and pachymetry do not correlate well with keratoconus severity.

How to cite this article

Kanellopoulos AJ, Moustou V, Asimellis G. Evaluation of Visual Acuity, Pachymetry and Anterior-Surface Irregularity in Keratoconus and Crosslinking Intervention Follow-up in 737 Cases. J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2013;2(3):95-103.


PDF Share
  1. Baseline findings in the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39(13):2537-2546.
  2. How keratoconus influences optical performance of the eye. J Vis 2008;8(2):13.1-10.
  3. Evaluation of total and corneal wavefront high order aberrations for the detection of forme fruste keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53(6):2978-2992.
  4. Customized hydrogel contact lenses for keratoconus incorporating correction for vertical coma aberration. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009;29(3):321-329.
  5. Stability of simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy and riboflavin/ UVA cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: case reports. J Refract Surg 2010;26(10):827-832.
  6. Introduction of quantitative and qualitative cornea optical coherence tomography findings, induced by collagen cross-linking for keratoconus; a novel effect measurement benchmark. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:329-335.
  7. Long-term results of a prospective randomized bilateral eye comparison trial of higher fluence, shorter duration ultraviolet A radiation, and riboflavin collagen cross linking for progressive keratoconus. Clin Ophthalmol 2012;6:97-101.
  8. Revisiting keratoconus diagnosis and progression classification based on evaluation of corneal asymmetry indices, derived from Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and suspect cases. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:1539-1548.
  9. Correlation of topometric and tomographic indices with visual acuity in patients with keratoconus. Int J of Kerat and Ectatic Dis 2012;1(3):167-172.
  10. Progression of keratoconus and efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking in children and adolescents. J Refract Surg 2012;28(11):753-758.
  11. Corneal collagen cross-linking using riboflavin and ultraviolet A for the treatment of mild to moderate keratoconus: 2-year follow-up. Can J Ophthalmol 2013;48(1):63-68.
  12. Comparison of Placido disc and Scheimpflug image-derived topography-guided excimer laser surface normalization combined with higher fluence CXL: the Athens Protocol, in progressive keratoconus. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:1385-1396.
  13. Keratoconus management: long term stability of topography-guided normalization combined with high fluence CXL stabilization (The Athens Protocol). J Refract Surg 2014 (in press).
  14. The epidemiology and etiology of keratoconus. Int J Keratoco Ectatic Corneal Dis 2012;1(1):7-15.
  15. Correlation between central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth and corneal keratometry as measured by oculyzer ii and wavelight OB820 in preoperative cataract surgery patients. J Refract Surg 2012;28(12):895-900.
  16. Long-term bladeless LASIK outcomes with the FS200 femtosecond and EX500 excimer laser workstation: the refractive suite. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:261-269.
  17. Validation of the ectasia risk score system for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:813-818.
  18. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2011;27(10):753-758.
  19. Keratoconus: classification scheme based on videokeratography and clinical signs. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:1597-1603.
  20. Corneal topography indices after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37(7):1282-1290.
  21. Identification of scanning slit-beam topographic parameters important in distinguishing normal from keratoconic corneal morphologic features. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143(3):401-408.
  22. Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus. J Refract Surg 1995;11:371-379.
  23. Vertical D. A novel topographic pattern in some keratoconus suspects. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1020-1026.
  24. Cornealthickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1851-1859.
  25. Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007;18(9):325-333.
  26. Validity of the keratometric index: evaluation by the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34(1): 137-145.
  27. Topometric and tomographic indices for the diagnosis of keratoconus. Int J of Kerat and Ectatic Dis 2012;1(2):100-106.
  28. Evaluation of anterior segment parameters in keratoconic eyes measured with the Pentacam system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33(10):1708-1712.
  29. Predicting visual performance from optical quality metrics in keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 2009;92(3):289-296.
  30. Keratoconus-integrated characterization considering anterior corneal aberrations, internal astigmatism and corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37(3):552-568.
  31. Correlation of corneal elevation with severity of keratoconus by means of anterior and posterior topographic analysis. Cornea 2012;31(3):253-258.
  32. Comparison of sequential vs same-day simultaneous collagen cross-linking and topography-guided PRK for treatment of keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2009;25(9):S812-818.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.