International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases

Register      Login

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2012 ) > List of Articles


Correlation of Anterior Segment Parameters in Keratoconus Patients

Leonardo Torquetti

Citation Information : Torquetti L. Correlation of Anterior Segment Parameters in Keratoconus Patients. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2012; 1 (2):87-91.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1017

Published Online: 01-08-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; The Author(s).



To evaluate the corneal asphericity, volume, thickness and keratometry and the correlation among these variables in keratoconus patients.

Materials and methods

A total of 1,071 eyes of 810 patients diagnosed with keratoconus were evaluated with a Pentacam (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH). Five groups were established according to the mean keratometry readings: Very mild [K < 44.0 diopters (D)], mild (K = 44.0-47.0D), moderate (K = 47.0-52.0D), severe (K = 52.0-60.0D) and very severe (K = 60.0 or higher). The following parameters were obtained: Anterior corneal asphericity (Q), corneal volume (CV) and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT).


Sixty-six eyes had very mild keratoconus, 269 had mild keratoconus, 465 had moderate keratoconus, 233 had severe keratoconus and 38 had very severe keratoconus. As the severity of disease increases, there is an increment in K and CV values and reduction of Q and TCT. There was a statistically significant difference in values for all parameters, except the CV. The Pearson correlation index showed an inverse correlation between the degree of keratoconus and the asphericity (Q), i.e. the more severe the keratoconus the more negative the Q-value. Only in the very severe group there was no statistically significant correlation between K and Q. There was no correlation between severity of keratoconus and CV. There was an inverse correlation between keratoconus grade and TCT; the more advanced the disease the less the TCT value. Only in the very mild group there was no correlation between K and TCT.


The corneal asphericity and pachymetry are inversely correlated to keratometry in keratoconus patients. There is no correlation between CV and severity of keratoconus.

How to cite this article

Torquetti L, Ferrara G, Ferrara P. Correlation of Anterior Segment Parameters in Keratoconus Patients. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2012;1(2):87-91.

PDF Share
  1. Subclinical keratoconus and inflammatory molecules from tears. Br J Ophthalmol 2009 Jun;93(6):820-24.
  2. Inflammatory response to contact lenses in patients with keratoconus compared with myopic subjects. Cornea 2008 Aug;27(7):758-63.
  3. Inflammatory molecules in the tears of patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2005 Apr;112(4):654-59.
  4. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42: 297-319.
  5. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol 1984;28:293-322.
  6. Investigations on lens transparency and its disturbances by microdensitometric analyses of Scheimpflug photographs. Curr Eye Res 1984;3:15-22.
  7. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:1729-35.
  8. Assessed 5/March/2011.
  9. Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46: 1948-56.
  10. Collagen fibril orientation in the human corneal stroma and its implication in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:121-29.
  11. Corneal asphericity and apical curvature in children: A cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46: 1899-906.
  12. Characterization of the aspheric corneal surface with intrastromal corneal ring segments. J Refract Surg 1999;15:520-28.
  13. Topographic determination of corneal asphericity and its lack of effect on the refractive outcome of radial keratotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;275-80.
  14. Asfericidad corneal en una poblácion de adultos jóvenes. Implicaciones clínicas. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2004;79: 385-92.
  15. Objective quality of vision in presbyopic and nonpresbyopic patients after pseudoaccommodative advanced surface ablation. J Refract Surg 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5 Suppl):S603-05.
  16. Corneal asphericity changes after implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus. J Emmetropia 2010;1:178-81.
  17. The new Ferrara ring nomogram: The importance of corneal asphericity in ring selection. Vision Panamerica 2010 Sep;92-95. Available from:
  18. Keratoconus-integrated characterization considering anterior corneal aberrations, internal astigmatism, and corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011 Mar;37(3):552-68.
  19. Measure of keratoconus progression using Orbscan II. J Refract Surg 2008;24:600-05.
  20. CLEK study group: A new method for grading the severity of keratoconus: The keratoconus severity score (KSS). Cornea 2006 Aug;25(7):794-800.
  21. Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:456-63.
  22. Corneal volume, pachymetry and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:814-25.
  23. Evaluation of anterior segment parameters in keratoconic eyes measured with Pentacam system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1708-12.
  24. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2010;117:673-79.
  25. Corneal- thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: Tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1851-59.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.