The Challenges of the Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus at Its Earliest Stage
Alain Saad
Citation Information :
Saad A. The Challenges of the Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus at Its Earliest Stage. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2012; 1 (1):36-43.
Gatinel D, Saad A. The Challenges of the Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus at Its Earliest Stage. Int J Keratoco Ectatic Corneal Dis 2012;1(1):36-43.
Evaluation of a risk factor scoring system for corneal ectasia after LASIK in eyes with normal topography. J Refract Surg 26(4):241-50.
Validation of the ectasia risk score system for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145(5): 813-18.
Retrospective testing of a new method for detecting ectasia-susceptible corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(10):1907-08.
Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: The Siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol 149(4):585-93.
Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet-A corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: The Siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol 150(4):588; author reply-9.
Topographic and tomographic properties of forme fruste keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(11):5546-55.
Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(6):2912-16.
Chasing the suspect: Keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93(7):845-47.
Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(7):3424-32.
Computer-assisted corneal topography in keratoconus. Refract Corneal Surg 1989;5(6): 400-08.
KISA% index: A quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25(10):1327-35.
Keratoconus detection with the KISA% method-another view. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26(4):472-74.
The ‘forme fruste’ of keratoconus. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1961;73:842-43.
Current keratoconus detection methods compared with a neural network approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38(11):2290-99.
Corneal- thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: Tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(11):1851-59.
Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(1):156-62.
Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and postrefractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by ocular response analyser. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32(3): 129-32.
Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: Curve analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(12):2144-50.
Total, corneal and internal ocular optical aberrations in patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2009;25(10 Suppl):S951-57.
Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143(3):381-89.
Corneal higher order aberrations: A method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2006;22(6):539-45.
The evidentiary significance of case reports: Eye rubbing and keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85(4):262-69.
Can true monocular keratoconus occur? Clin Exp Optom 2003;86(6):399-402.
Longitudinal analysis of corneal topography in suspected keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93(6):815-19.
Genetic epidemiological study of keratoconus: Evidence for major gene determination. Am J Med Genet 2000;93(5):403-09.
Molecular genetic analysis in autosomal dominant keratoconus. Cornea 1992;11(4):302-08.
Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients. Ophthalmology 2004;111(3):440-46.
Incidence and characteristics of unilateral keratoconus classified on corneal topography. J Refract Surg 27(10):745-51.
Contribution of the corneal epithelium to anterior corneal topography in patients having myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33(11):1860-65.
Epithelial, stromal and total corneal thickness in keratoconus: Three-dimensional display with artemis very-high frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg 26(4):259-71.